I'm sure many of us woke up on the first day of July this year, feeling relieved, like finally we were breathing fresh air after a long while, that at last, the Arroyo presidency is over.
I was imagining yesterday that if I had a kid, or if we had pupils, who got into high school in 2001, they are of working age already (I wouldn't say they are working already because there are no jobs to be found) by this time that Arroyo has finally stepped down. (That is a long time to build a culture.)
I remember myself entering elementary school in 1973, and was a fresh college graduate, young and unemployed, when I got to know another president.
Then I started thinking of parallelisms between the situation I faced as a youth then and the situation that the youth find themselves in today. Parehong Aquino ang una naming nakilalang ibang presidente. Both Aquinos are taking over long-running, corrupt, economically and politically repressive regimes. And simply because the name is attached to an image, both become icons of democracy and combined popular support and spontaneous appeal, multi-colored traditional politicians and civil society groups, with emphasis on the latter, openly supported by big business elites and endorsed by the US, with the US penchant for icons and plain semblances of democracy.
When Cory Aquino took over, the Philippines was one of the most heavily indebted countries in the world and was under the most stringent structural adjustment programs dictated by its creditors, the IMF and the World Bank. I graduated from UP and landed a job as a clerk in the warehouse of an air-conditioning company, which used to be under the government-owned corporation, Asia Industries, and was privatized by Cory Aquino a year later. Unemployment was so high that I never got the career that my mother had hoped for me. The country was in abject poverty, so well-known that I remember when tourists came to the country, part of their itinerary would be to visit Payatas to see to believe that indeed there was that extreme level of poverty. Like her son, Cory Aquino took over at a time that the crisis-ridden world economy was having its worst which manifested in a global debt crisis.
The youth of today face the same predicament, although at a worse, unprecedented and more advanced level: deep economic crisis, highest unemployment rate in history, widening and deepening poverty, and a global economic crisis that is worse than the 1930s Great Depression.
The Cory Aquino administration turned out be not as progressive as many had hoped. Its centerpiece program, the CARP, is a failure and drags on to this day. Its principle of “honor all debts” has been entrenched as a law that automatically appropriates budget for debt servicing whatever happens to the economy. Cory Aquino trail-blazed the country's full trade and investment liberalization by removing tariffs on more than 3,000 imported items and passing the Foreign Investment Act of 1991, which opened up key economic sectors to foreign investments. She started the privatization program by selling the government corporations that were more crucial in the country's industrialization. She devolved the government (Local Government Code) in the principle of deregulation. Cory Aquino introduced the regressive VAT to the Philippine taxation system and broke down the wage between basic and COLA and called it rationalization and killed the concept of 'living wage'.
Cory Aquino had spent just a year in office when the Mendiola Massacre of peasants happened in 1987. Noynoy Aquino had just three days when the violent dispersal of peasants and advocates happened in Mendiola on July 3. I remember the activist Lean Alejandro also being assassinated in 1987. President Noynoy Aquino has barely spent a month in office and three activists have already been killed in the last 15 days – one Bayan Muna representative, a 78-year-old peasant leader, and a young teacher.
Will things be a repeat of history. No, that is a wrong concept. History does not repeat itself, because if history does repeat itself then the country's economic and political crisis would not be in this more advanced stage. Then why are we having another Aquino? There are just things that endure and continue to re-assert themselves, like the recurring crises of global capitalism, foreign plunder, inequitable economy, and of course, ruling social classes.
The people's euphoria at this point, especially of the youth who just voted for the first time, is understandable. We are just getting over a regime that brazenly represented foreign and elite interests as well as its own preservation agenda. The euphoria, however, is not coming from the realization that democracy is working in the country because that is not so. The euphoria is simply coming from the smooth transition of power that happened, though just from one elite faction to another.
Go home! Shake off that false euphoria, that is the challenge to all of us this afternoon. Refuse to be just entertained, especially by the entertainment industry. Go beyond icons and symbols, the country's problems are real and far more fundamental than how they are being trivialized by icon-makers. Always seek and talk about the truth, and that has always been the running theme of the IBON Birdtalk.
(Closing remarks delivered during the Midyear 2010 IBON Birdtalk with high schools students and teachers as audience. The IBON Birdtalk is a biannual briefing forum on the economic and political situation of the country.)